Stats, Standards & Surveys!
This article I think is worth reading for many reasons- and beyond just for family mediators. Issues such as saving, accrediting mediators and determining success is not limited to court mediations surrounding family issues.
I'll start with the last sentence as I know it raises the most emotions in ADR folk:
a survey carried out by the Civil Mediation Council showed widespread support for its moves towards accredited training for mediators, the establishment of a register of mediators and clear quality standards.
Also, I must admit I do not often read the comments by readers, but for this article I was glad I did because there is heaps of information there as well:
So it cost over £3 million more to administer the scheme than it saved! How many people could have been helped using this huge sum of money. Also I would question the effectiveness of a partial settlement using mediation.
Feedback from another reader:It’s a very short article and there are issues that need to be made clearer:• the mediators are not trained to a high enough level to be really effective, and certainly they are unable to either detect or deal with the "loonies" (the implacably hostile) who inflict so much harm upon the children as they fight it out over many years.
• the ongoing involvement of the family lawyers is usually unhelpful – mediation is robbing them of their revenue stream after all. There are no sanctions for refusing to mediate.
• a 28% settlement rate in hostile courtroom surroundings is not be sniffed at.
• how much money did the 28% save the court service - where did this £3m figure come from quoted by Jacqueline Emmerson??
In short, I think given all of the above, the results are actually positive given the zero development that has been attempted in terms of exploiting the potential of mediation and raising the quality of mediatiors.
Read the full article [here].